image: Download
bricolagelovers:
Ryoji Ikeda // The Transfinite // 2011
I keep coming back to Ikeda’s work again and again, though I’ve only seen it once in a live performance by the collective Dumb Type @ 2002. It seems like part of the lineage of Kubelka’s work that I was posting earlier tonight. Both are about tactility and rhythm just as much as they are about minimalism and black and white aesthetic functions. My blogmixes aspire to something that appeals to me in both Kubelka’s and Ikeda’s work. I still have a ways to go with my material, but I am nowhere near ready to let go of that bone.
stagnantpond:
Arnulf Rainer
Peter Kubelka | 1960 | 7 minutes | B&W | Sound
“He has even created a film whose images can no more be ‘turned off’ by the closing of eyes than can the soundtrack thereof it (for it is composed entirely of white frame rhythming thru black inter-spaces and of such an intensity as to create its pattern straight thru closed eyelids) so that the whole ‘mix’ of the audio-visual experience is clearly ‘in the head,’ so to speak: and if one looks at it openly, one can see one’s own eye cells as if projected onto the screen and can watch one’s optic physiology activated by the sound track in what is, surely, the most basic Dance of Life of all (for the sounds of the film do resemble and, thus, prompt the inner-ear’s hearing of its own pulse output at intake of sound)… These films must, very truly, be seen and very truly seen and heard to be believed!” - Stan Brakhage
harryweller:
Background to the work “Monument Film” -
In 1960 Peter Kubelka put the finishing touches to his film Arnulf Rainer, which is still today seen as a landmark in the history of cinema. In this radical work Kubelka reduced cinema to its simplest form of expression: light and darkness, silence and…
image: Download
whatmakespistachionuts:
don’t know how sympathetic I am to that formalism games/zines piece
think I’m personally on board with a much more rigorously mechanistic kind of formalism, more formalist than the formalists if you will, i.e. you have ‘video/computer games’ as simply all interactive electronic media (though this…
Systematic structures seem more important than forms to me. Forms are masks or virtual states. How they are actualized within a network seems more significant. It’s like when Deleuze suggests that a brick can be used to break a window or construct a wall of reason. In many cases an intense study of how a “form” is used within a system is the first step in figuring out how to hack that system.